联系我们
加入收藏
设为首页
 
 
      已有成就 | 法律法规 | 审判机构 | 政策精神 | 审判信息 | 案例分析 | 文书精选 | 法官论坛 | 学术讨论 | 行政执法 | 诉讼讲座
      专家专栏 | 记者专栏 | 来稿选登 | 协会动态 | 网友论坛 | 国际条约 | 域外法制 | 环球科技 | 读者来信 | 对外交流 | 各地法院
      照片选登 | 问题解答 | 随      笔 | 书       讯 | 站点地图 | 中文繁体 | English   | 在线投诉 | 我要在线投诉
 
您的位置:首页 - 学术讨论
An email from Dr. Alan Cox: Trends in Litigation and Economic Damages in China

 

Hello,

I am sending you copy of a working paper that I hope you will find interesting.  My colleague, Kristina Sepetys, and I have just completed an update of our paper: “Intellectual Property Rights Protection in China:  Trends in Litigation and Economic Damages.” (http://www.nera.com/publication.asp?p_ID=3693).

The paper first describes the changing role of Intellectual Property Rights (“IPR”) enforcement in an evolving economy such as China’s.  It also describes the judicial and administrative procedures available for IPR enforcement.  Then, drawing upon a unique dataset we have compiled, the paper examines trends in damage awards in IPR cases in China.  We conclude that IPR damages in China are generally too low to compensate IPR owners for their losses or to have any meaningful deterrent effect.  China-based plaintiffs appear to receive lower awards in cases in which they prevail than foreign-based plaintiffs.

However, these findings also suggest that significant damage awards are being awarded and that the frequency of such awards continues to increase.  This conclusion is corroborated by recent events.  For example, in a recent decision by the Intermediate People's Court of Hangzhou, Korean electronics maker Samsung was ordered to pay approximately $7.3 million in compensation to Holley Communications for infringing Holley's handset patent.  Also, the Beijing Intermediate Court recently awarded the German bus maker Neoplan about $2.9 million for infringement of its design patents for buses. 

In another important development, the Standing Committee of China’s National People’s Congress recently approved the third Amendment to China’s Patent law.  The revised Law will take effect on October 1, 2009, and includes, among other features, a provision to increase the upper limit of statutory damages to 1 million Yuan (about $150,000).

This paper will also be available in Chinese.  Please contact me if you would like to have a copy in Chinese.

I would welcome your feedback.

Regards,

    _______________________________

    Alan Cox
    Senior Vice President
    NERA
       Economic Consulting
    One Front Street, Suite 2600
    San Francisco, CA 94111
    Tel: 1-415-291-1009, Fax: 1-415-291-1020
    Mobile: 1-925-297-7437

    Alan.Cox@NERA.com
    www.nera.com
    _______________________________ 

    Dr. Alan Cox
    Senior Vice President

    Dr. Cox participates in NERA's Intellectual Property, Securities, and Antitrust Practices. He has extensive testimonial experience before juries in Federal and state court, before panels of arbitrators, and before administrative law judges. His experience includes the high technology, retailing, telecommunications, and energy industries.

    He has estimated intellectual property damages in matters involving semiconductor patents, disputes over technology sharing agreements in microprocessors, and patent fraud. He testified in a matter involving alleged theft of trade secrets and false advertising in the manufacture and sale of golf balls. He was recently retained by Texas Instruments in a patent case against GlobespanVirata, which resulted in a jury award of $112 million to Texas Instruments. He has also testified on antitrust allegations arising out of licensing practices in metal fabrication. Other industries in which he has consulted or testified in intellectual property matters include molecular biology, biotechnology, and software.

    Dr. Cox has also testified in class action securities fraud cases and filed affidavits on matters such as class certification, the impact of allegedly disparaging statements on securities prices, and a wide array of financial damages. He has also prepared testimony and reports in criminal matters and civil complaints.

    Dr. Cox has testified on several antitrust issues. These include Robinson-Patman Act matters, the competitiveness of crude oil and product pipelines, the competitive consequences of a major electric utility merger, and allegations of price fixing of professional services. Dr. Cox has undertaken economic analysis of asserted damages due to alleged attempts to monopolize portions of the credit-card industry.

    Dr. Cox holds a PhD in economic analysis and policy from the Haas School of Business at the University of California at Berkeley and an MA in economics from the University of British Columbia. He has previously held positions as a Senior Vice President at LECG and as a Visiting Economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Energy Laboratory.


 

Intellectual Property Rights Protection in China: Trends in Litigation

and Economic Damages

By Kristina Sepetys and Dr. Alan Cox

As a result of external pressures and to meet its own economic objectives, China has been moving its intellectual property rights (IPR) regime closer to those found in many more developed nations. As China's economy grows, its transition from manufacturing-based to knowledge-based production, more comprehensive laws, and more attention to enforcement have led to an increase in the number of IPR infringement cases being brought before the courts or taken up through China's administrative procedures. Allowing IP owners to recover their economic damages from infringers is an important component of a system for IPR protection. Properly determined, damage awards can serve as an effective deterrent to IPR violations and protect the incentives to innovate.

While problems of intellectual property infringement are widespread in many areas of the world, some Chinese and foreign observers continue to assert that more should be done to deter counterfeiting in China. According to many of these observers, IPR owners are generally compensated for only a small proportion of their losses under existing law. If these contentions are correct, such low damages discourage the filing of meritorious lawsuits and generally fail to adequately protect intellectual property.

In this paper, NERA Senior Consultant Kristina Sepetys and Senior Vice President Dr. Alan Cox examine the pattern of damages awards by Chinese courts. To put this examination of damage awards in context, the authors first review the evolution of IPR protection as an economy becomes increasingly dependent on knowledge-based production. For readers who are not familiar with the remedies for IPR infractions in China, they then describe the laws and procedures in China for the protection of IPR, including both judicial and administrative procedures. Finally, the authors describe the results of a statistical analysis of a unique dataset that they have compiled on recent damage awards in IP cases in China.(http://www.nera.com/publication.asp?p_ID=3693.)


文章出处:
本网发布时间:2009/2/1 15:11:51
[推荐朋友] [关闭窗口]  [回到顶部]
 

 

 

版权所有,未经许可不得转载镜像